Evidence used to justify the banning of Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from a Premier League match against Aston Villa was reportedly altered to support the decision, MPs have heard. The incident has raised concerns over police procedures and the accuracy of intelligence used in operational decisions.
Evidence ‘Changed to Fit Decision’
Lord Mann, the government’s independent adviser on antisemitism, told the Home Affairs Committee that some of the details provided by West Midlands Police were “inaccurate” and “conflated” incidents. He highlighted claims of running street battles and attacks on taxi drivers that either did not happen or were exaggerated.
He said,
“I think what you’re saying is the facts slightly changed to fit the decision.” When asked to confirm, Lord Mann replied, “Right. Correct. Yes.”
One notable error referenced a match between Maccabi Tel Aviv and West Ham, which had never occurred. Chief Constable Craig Guildford admitted that the mention had been included in the report based on a social media post.
Police and Safety Officials Defend Ban
Despite questions about the accuracy of the intelligence, police officials defended the ban, saying it was the best way to protect the local community and players. Assistant Chief Constable Mike O’Hara and Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster emphasized that the Maccabi fans were considered highly organised and potentially violent.
Guildford told MPs:
“The ultras were very well organised, militaristic in the way that they operated. They attacked members of the local community, including taxi drivers. Tore down flags. People were thrown into the river.”
He also said Dutch police were “unequivocal” that they would not want Maccabi playing in Amsterdam again due to prior clashes with the local Muslim community.
Mixed Reactions and Political Comments
The match at Villa Park on 6 November, policed by more than 700 officers, passed without serious disorder, and only a handful of arrests were reported. The Prime Minister criticized the ban while affirming that antisemitism would not be tolerated and that football fans should be able to enjoy matches without fear.
Guildford reflected on political involvement in operational matters:
“Politicians should freely be allowed to express their views. But from an operational policing perspective, sometimes public comments can increase tension and risk.”
The controversy continues as MPs and football fans debate whether the ban was proportionate or based on manipulated evidence.
Also Read: Onana Shock Omission as Cameroon Sack Coach Before Afcon
